“Creative freedom” seems straightforward: use whatever tool you have or like, and create or contribute as long as the work gets done. If the goal is images, someone should be free to use MS Paint, Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Affinity, or Pinta, because the final output is what counts, right?
The caveat is that “creative freedom” is an easy label to abuse. It can be used to restrict what you can do and make leaving harder. So by guardrails, I mean shared definitions and best practices that protect the term from being stretched into a free-for-all and used to justify lock-in.
That’s why we should talk about it.
Creative Systems Insight: Freedom needs protection
The core understanding I'd like to offer is that guardrails aren’t walls; they’re boundaries. They protect meaning by supporting your freedom to move work between systems, control your output, and switch the tools you use.
For me, the essential guardrails come down to four core freedoms:
Freedom to Survive Your work should be built on documented, portable formats, ideally open standards. Workflows should also coexist without breaking files or blocking migration. If your work lives in one proprietary format, long-term access can end up depending on that tool.
Freedom to Choose Subscriptions are fine, but exit penalties, hidden fees, and degraded access are not. Leaving should not be expensive or painful. If you cannot leave cleanly, the “choice” is cosmetic.
Freedom to Modify You should be able to adjust tools in-house without waiting on a vendor’s roadmap. Even proprietary tools can support legitimate modification through extensions, self-hosting, enterprise source access, or clear customisation rights. If you cannot adapt the tool, the tool eventually defines your limits.
Freedom to Redistribute If your work needs a runtime, player, or component to function, you should be able to ship it. Boundaries should be clear: what is user work, what is the tool, and what obligations travel with distribution? Blender’s former game engine, now UPBGE, is a useful example. GPL protects freedom of use, but shipping the runtime means distribution must comply with the GPL.
We Need to think beyond costs and access
Protecting our creative freedom must be about more than pricing models and code availability. A licence can preserve freedom in one layer and restrict it in another, which is why these guardrails matter together. Portability, exit rights, modification, and redistribution are not separate debates.
They are just different ways of asking the same thing: does this tool leave you in control, or does it quietly take control over time? This is why I think we should have the conversation over the essential freedoms that serve as the guardrails to creative freedom, so the term still holds when switching tools, sharing files, shipping projects, or simply changing our minds.
Practical Tip: Build Your Own Creative Freedom Checklist
Pick one active project and write a short checklist that fits your reality. You do not need a perfect system. You just need a way to spot traps early.
Start with these questions:
- If I switched tools next month, could I take my work without rebuilding it?
- Are my sources in formats I can open elsewhere without losing structure?
- If payment stops, does my work remain accessible in a meaningful way?
- Can I extend or modify the tool if my needs change?
- If the tool includes a runtime or required component, can I ship my work without licensing minefields?
The goal is not purity. The goal is durability.
Creative freedom is not just the freedom to start. It is the freedom to continue, to switch, and to survive change.
If you want to stay in this lane
- Creative freedom as a lifeline (and where that thinking came from): My Time At The Creative Freedom Summit 2024
- A practical example of building a portable workflow without vendor pressure: I Built a Professional Creative Stack Without Subscriptions (Deep Dive)
Working with us
At RolandiXor Media Inc., we blend design and open-source thinking for our clients.
Elsewhere
- Mastodon: mastodon.social/@rolandixor
- Threads: @rolandixor
- X: @rolandixor
Support this work
If this writing has been useful and you’d like to help sustain it:
→ https://ko-fi.com/rolandixor
Catch you in the next Roll Out!
